MCAT MCAT-TEST dumps - 100% Pass Guarantee!

The Russian wheat aphid, Diuraphis noxia, is a small green insect discovered in southern Russia around the turn of the century. Agricultural researchers are not quite sure, but they believe the Russian aphid adapted itself to wheat about ten thousand years ago, when the crop was first domesticated by man. What is not in doubt is the insect's destructiveness. Spread by both wind and human transport, the Russian aphid has destroyed wheat fields throughout Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Until a few years ago, the United States had been free of this pest. But in the spring of 1986, a swarm of Russian aphids crossed the Mexican border and settled a few hundred miles north, in central Texas. From there, it quickly spread to other Western states, destroying wheat fields all along its path. In fact, the level of destruction has been so great over the past five years that entomologists are calling the Russian aphid the greatest threat to American agriculture since the Hessian fly, Phytophaga destructor, was inadvertently brought to the colonies on ships by German mercenary troops during the Revolutionary War. A combination of several factors have made it particularly difficult to deal with the threat posed by this aphid. First, Russian aphids reproduce asexually at a phenomenal rate. This process, known as parthenogenesis, often results in as many as twenty generations of insects in a single year. Although most generations remain in a limited geographic area because they have no wings, a few generations are born with wings, allowing the insect to spread to new areas. Second, because wheat is a crop with a very low profit margin, most American farmers do not spray it with pesticides; it simply is not economical to do so. And since the Russian aphid has only recently entered the United States, it has no natural enemies among North American insects or animals. As a result, there have been no man-made or natural obstacles to the spread of the Russian aphid in the United States. Agricultural researchers seeking to control the Russian aphid have looked to its place of origin for answers. In the Soviet Union, the Russian aphid has been kept in check by predators which have evolved alongside it over many thousands of years. One species of wasp seems to be particularly efficient at destroying the aphid. The pregnant females of the species search the Russian aphid's home, the interior of a wheat stalk, sting the aphid into paralysis, and then inject an egg into its body. When the egg hatches the wasp larva feeds off of the aphid, killing it in the process.

The introduction of predators like the wasp, coupled with the breeding of new strains of insect-resistant wheat, may substantially curb the destructiveness of the Russian aphid in the future. For the time being, however, American farmers are left to their own devices when it comes to protecting their wheat crops

The author suggests the best way to control the Russian aphid population in the United States is to:

A. devote less acreage to the production of wheat.

B. spray wheat fields with large quantities of pesticides.

C. transplant its natural enemies from the Soviet Union.

D. disrupt its reproductive process by sterilizing females.

Studies of photosynthesis began in the late eighteenth century. One scientist found that green plants produce a substance (later shown to be oxygen) that supports the flame of a candle in a closed container. Several years later it was discovered that a plant must be exposed to light in order to replenish this flame- sustaining "substance." Soon another discovery showed that the oxygen is formed at the expense of another gas, carbon dioxide.

In 1804, de Saussure conducted experiments revealing that equal volumes of carbon dioxide and oxygen are exchanged between a plant and the air surrounding it. De Saussure determined that the weight gained by a plant grown in a pot equals the sum of the weights of carbon derived from absorbed carbon dioxide and water absorbed through plant roots. Using this information, de Saussure was able to postulate that in photosynthesis carbon dioxide and water combine using energy in the form of light to produce carbohydrates, water, and free oxygen. Much later, in 1845, scientists' increased understanding of concepts of chemical energy led them to perceive that, through photosynthesis, light energy is transformed and stored as chemical energy.

In the twentieth century, studies comparing photosynthesis in green plants and in certain sulfur bacteria yielded important information about the photosynthetic process. Because water is both a reactant and a product in the central reaction, it had long been assumed that the oxygen released by photosynthesis comes from splitting the carbon dioxide molecule. In the 1930s, however, this popular view was decisively altered by the studies of C. B. Van Niel. Van Niel studied sulfur bacteria, which use hydrogen sulfide for photosynthesis in the same way that green plants use water, and produce sulfur instead of oxygen. Van Niel saw that the use of carbon dioxide to form carbohydrates was similar in the two types of organisms. He reasoned that the oxygen produced by green plants must derive from water -- rather than carbon dioxide, as previously assumed -- in the same way that the sulfur produced by the bacteria derives from hydrogen sulfide. Van Niel's finding was important because the earlier belief had been that oxygen was split off from carbon dioxide, and that carbon then combined with water to form carbohydrates. The new postulate was that, with green plants, hydrogen is removed from water and then combines with carbon dioxide to form the carbohydrates needed by the organism.

Later, Van Niel's assertions were strongly backed by scientists who used water marked with a radioactive isotope of oxygen in order to follow photosynthetic reactions. When the photosynthetically-produced free oxygen was analyzed, the isotope was found to be present.

According to the passage, the study of organisms that require hydrogen sulfide for photosynthesis:

A. proved that oxygen is not produced in photosynthesis.

B. contradicted the notion that oxygen is needed to support a candle's flame.

C. disproved assumptions about the role of light energy in photosynthesis.

D. clarified the role of water in photosynthesis among green plants.

The lining of the digestive tract and the respiratory tract develops from which germ layer?

I. Endoderm

II. Mesoderm

III.

Ectoderm

A.

I only

B.

II only

C.

III only

D.

I and II

A researcher investigated the equilibrium between CO2, C, and CO as a function of temperature. The equation is given below:

CO2(g) + C(s) 2 CO(g) Carbon dioxide, at 298 K and 1 atm, and an excess of powdered carbon were introduced into a furnace, which was then sealed so that pressure would increase as the temperature rose. The furnace was heated to, and held constant at, a predetermined temperature. The pressure within the furnace chamber was recorded after it had remained unchanged for one hour. The table below shows the pressures recorded for a series of temperatures together with the pressures expected if no reaction had taken place. Table 1

Which of the following shows the correct Lewis structure of carbon monoxide?

A. Option A

B. Option B

C. Option C

D. Option D

The Earth's atmosphere reaches hundreds of kilometers above the surface of the planet. The lowest layer, the troposphere, extends from the ground to a height of approximately 12 km. Air pressure within the troposphere decreases with height above the ground, accompanied by a parallel trend in air density. The decrease in density has important consequences for the dissipation of air pollution from industrial smoke stacks. The gas from the stack is typically hotter and less dense than the surrounding air and rises. As a parcel of hot air rises, it expands approximately adiabatically doing work on the surrounding air. This results in a decrease in both its temperature and its density.

Figure 1 A smoke stack functions to expel gaseous waste products from a chemical process. It is also an important means of removing heat from a reaction mixture. The heat corresponding to a change in temperature of a gas at constant pressure is

given by , where is the heat added to the gas, n is the number of moles of gas, is the molar heat capacity of a particular gas at constant pressure, and T is the change in temperature. At atmospheric pressure, the

molar heat capacity for steam, O (g) is approximately four times that of air.

According to Figure 1, what is the approximate relationship between the energy content of a liter of air at 12 km and that of a liter of air at 120 km?

A. The energy content in a liter at 12 km is greater because the mass is greater.

B. The energy content in a liter at 120 km is greater because the temperature is higher.

C. The energy content in a liter at 120 km is greater because the air is less dense.

D. The energy contents are equal because the volumes are equal.